Frame the question
Essays and a qualitative study with seven professional designers explored curation, autonomy and responsibility in AI-supported design.
AI can write, plan and act. The interface still asks us to squeeze intent, context and control into one text box. I built a pattern library to explore what happens when that work gets its own surface.
Plan the report. Make it concise. Use these sources. Ask before publishing.
For a quick question, chat is useful. For longer work, one field has to carry intent, constraints, context, feedback, control and revision. People must remember what the system knows, what it will do next and where they can intervene.
Claude
App builder
Perplexity
ChatGPT
Manus
DeepSeekThe design question became practical: which parts of AI work should be visible, steerable and checkable before they disappear into a prompt?
The Property Panel turns part of a prompt into direct controls. This small illustration lets you change a sample response; the full prototype ↗ explores the pattern in more depth.
Draft a project update
“Summarise the status for the team. Keep the facts and dates intact.”
Example source: fictional status note
The content stays explicit. Form, detail and evidence become decisions you can see and revise.
The research separates a principle from the process and the controls that carry it. That distinction matters when AI moves from answering questions to acting on someone’s behalf.
AI can open possibilities. People should retain the authority to select, intervene and take responsibility for what is done.
Structured choices and adjustable autonomy make the scope of a task clear before and during the work.
Visible state, scoped actions and evidence give that principle a concrete place in the product.
A trip planner can do substantial work before anything is booked. Explore where the interface can prepare, reveal and hand a decision back to a person.
The system can collect options, while showing where they came from and when the information was checked.
Illustrative trip-planning scenario from the BMW UXCOMM talk. The degree of autonomy depends on the risk and reversibility of each action.
The 2025 essay asked whether an AI system could be observed, anticipated and directed. As the pattern library developed, explainability became a fourth question. DOPE is a design lens for the interface layer.
Give people a way to edit the plan, set boundaries and change course while the system is working.
Explore Editable Plan ↗Explore the full DOPE framework ↗ in the live library.
Beyond Chat collects interaction patterns already appearing in products alongside emerging and speculative directions. Every entry pairs a concrete idea with a prototype, its use case, risks and examples.

Steer a result with visible parameters instead of writing the same instruction again.
The library is designed to be explored. Each prototype is a starting point for a design decision, not a universal recipe.
Browse all patternsI began with writing about autonomy in design, then studied seven designers’ AI-assisted work. The public library turned those questions into prototypes. Subsequent research and product-example audits exposed claims that needed to become more precise.
Essays and a qualitative study with seven professional designers explored curation, autonomy and responsibility in AI-supported design.
Five pattern families, a shared schema and interactive demos made the ideas comparable across writing, visual work, agents, trust and memory.
Research reviews and a targeted audit of 70 example rows across 18 patterns checked whether references actually demonstrated the interaction described.
28 mature
40 emerging
12 aspirational
Evidence status of the 80 patterns — distinct from whether their catalogue pages are live.An account of a result that a person can inspect.
The route the model actually took.
A displayed chain of reasoning can be a useful account of a result, but it is not necessarily a faithful window into how a model arrived there. The pattern’s risk language was revised after the research review.
That correction matters: a pattern library should help teams ask better questions, including where its own examples are uncertain.
Read the research notes ↗Beyond Chat is live as a public design resource: 80 catalogue entries across five families, interactive prototypes and research notes. The work also informed publications and talks on control in human–AI interaction.
The next question is empirical. A separate study platform has been built to compare chat with structured controls; participant testing and outcome data are still ahead. The library makes possibilities tangible. It does not, by itself, prove better performance or trust.
SELECTED PATTERN PREVIEWS