Work About Publications Talks Contact
Visualisation of the planned Albturm near Heubach

Albturm · Heubach

A tower as a gateway
to the future.

For the planned Albturm, a museum concept took shape that was meant to link the ascent with a digitally extended future forum.

Timeframe2018–2020
FocusVisitor journey and
digital museum
StatusHeubach project
stopped in 2023

01 / Starting point

How does a view become a museum?

A timber tower around 61.5 metres high was planned on the Utzenberg near Heubach. The view was to become the start of a visitor journey: from the panorama through digital cues to the future forum at the foot of the tower.

Together with Prof. Ralf Dringenberg, I developed the museum concept. Technological developments were the starting point for bigger questions: how do we want to live in the future, and what can the region contribute?

From the regional context to the planned site.

The Alter Turm (old tower) on the Utzenberg as a reference point for the planned site. Open in Google Maps ↗
Site plan of the future forum and Albturm on the Utzenberg as planned at the time
The design placed the Albturm and the future forum on the Utzenberg. The building outlines reflect the planning status at the time.
  • Stuttgart
  • Göppingen
  • Schwäbisch Gmünd
  • Heubach
  • Aalen

Project context

European Union, EFRE (ERDF) and Baden-Württemberg RegioWIN 2030 Ostalbkreis NiO Ziel: Zukunft

02 / Concept

Topics became a visitor journey.

With the museum, we wanted to look at familiar topics of the future from several perspectives and make connections visible. This led to a design for the tower, the forum and the digital content.

  1. 01

    Connecting topics.

    Work, housing, health, mobility, energy and society were conceived as linked questions. The example of mobility led from electromobility to the bigger question: how will we get around in the future?

    See the topic grid
  2. 02

    Sketching the route.

    The tower opened up the view; the forum offered space to go deeper. Storyboards translated this shift into a coherent sequence for the visit.

    See the visitor journey
  3. 03

    Structuring content.

    Four content levels were created for short cues and longer exploration. Four Sketch views gave the mobile level concrete shape as a design.

    See the content system

03 / Visitor journey

The ascent as a timeline.

An early topic plan used the levels of the tower as a journey from the Jurassic sea to personal questions about the future. With height, the view moved away from the visible place and towards developments that could change it.

Visualisation of the planned Albturm as a complete timber tower above the forest
01 / 04The view forward begins with the place.
Levels 01–03 · Past

Reading the place.

At the bottom, the story began with the formation of the Swabian Alb, the Jurassic sea and early traces of human life. What is visible as landscape today has a long history.

Levels 04–06 · Present

Understanding change.

Work, housing and the way we use resources came closer. The planned timber structure itself would have made one such question tangible: which material do we use, how do we build with it, and how can it be taken apart again?

Levels 07–08 · Possible futures

Thinking beyond the horizon.

Further up, the questions became less tangible: climate, supply, mobility and digital identities. Their consequences reach beyond the visible region and cannot be read from a single object.

Level 09 · Your future

Finding your own position.

At the highest point, the view was not meant to deliver a finished forecast. It became the starting point for a question: which development affects me – and what do I want to help shape? For mobility, that meant: how do we want to get around in the future?

The four stages condense a content draft from 2019. The tower and this exhibition were not built in Heubach.

Panoramic visualisation of the planned tower on the Alb plateau with a wide view over the wooded region
The view of the landscape was the beginning. In the forum, the questions it raised were to be taken further. · Concept visualisation from the project archive.

From the panorama to everyday life.

The six fields linked technological developments with everyday questions. Each topic was to be understandable from several angles and open up new questions about life in the region.

How will we
live tomorrow?

Work

Cloudworking · Cobots

Housing

Smart home · Timber construction 4.0

Health

Wearables · Telemedicine

Mobility

Electromobility → Future mobility

Energy

Smart grid · Climate change

Society

Digital identity · Data ownership

One topic as an example

How do we want to move in the future?

  1. 01 / CueElectromobility

    A concrete technological development makes it easy to get started.

  2. 02 / PerspectivesMore than a drivetrain

    Energy, routes and everyday life become part of the same question.

  3. 03 / Guiding questionFuture mobility

    What kind of mobility do we want to shape as a society?

An illustrative translation of the concept question at the time, not a realised exhibit.

Design visualisation of the viewing platform in the timber tower with visitors on the stairs
The view from above · Design visualisation from the project archive.
Viewing platformFuture forum

From outlook to exchange.

The question was meant to travel back down to the foot of the tower. In the forum, visitors could have explored it further through linked content and discussed it with other perspectives.

Discover the idea for the forum

04 / Content system

Content that connects.

The digital exhibits were conceived as interconnected content. Visitors’ interests were to open up different paths through this network instead of leading everyone through the same sequence.

01

Teaser

An image or a short cue sparks interest.

02

Summary

The core of a topic can be grasped quickly.

03

Deep dive

Media and texts open up the wider context.

04

Connections

Related questions lead to further exhibits.

Visualisation of a networked topic space in the planned future forum
Spatial idea: topics become visible as a connected network.
Explore the space in the plan

05 / Designs

The idea finds its place.

The forum floor plan shows where exploration and encounter were to take place. The tower section and construction details then make the ascent visible as a spatial design.

The forum: space for new connections.

North of the tower, an open venue with a foyer, a café and an adaptable event space was planned. Here, people with different perspectives were to come together, explore the questions raised along the way and discuss ideas for the region.

One room. Three uses.

Foyer and café stay in the same place. On the right of the plan, the furnishing of the exhibition and event space changes.

Original floor plan of the visitor forum with free-standing exhibition elements in the right-hand room

Free-standing elements structure the room for an exhibition.

Enlarge plan ↗
Original plans: Birk Heilmeyer und Frenzel Architekten, preliminary design, 8 April 2019. The plan excerpts have been cropped consistently.View the full floor plan ↗

The tower: a path upwards.

The section and the detail drawing show the spiral ascent between the timber structure and the viewing platforms. This movement gave the first part of the museum concept its rhythm.

Tower section with four floor plans and a spiral ascent
Tower section and floor plans · Drawing: Jürgen Graf / Viktor Poteschkin.Open plan ↗
Detail drawings of the tower stairs, the timber shell and a circular floor plan
The ascent in detail · Drawing: Jürgen Graf / Viktor Poteschkin.Open plan ↗

How the structure was conceived.

The design proposed keeping the existing concrete mast and surrounding it with a lightweight gridshell of local, modified beech wood. Parametrically planned members and detachable joints were to make individual parts replaceable and allow the structure to be dismantled.

The animations show the model assembly and the jointing principle. They document a design, not a built tower.

Tower assembly in the model · Concept animation from the project archive, 2018.
Reversible joint · Construction detail from the project archive, 2018.
Exploded view of the planned connection between crossing timber members and detachable connectors
Jointing principle in detail · Project archive.
The assembled joint between crossing timber members
The assembled joint · Project archive.

06 / Project status

Where the project stands today.

The town of Heubach stopped the Albturm project in 2023 for financial reasons. The museum and the mobile level remained designs.

Oberkochen then looked into taking over the Albturm. What is being built there now is a Zukunftsforum (future forum) without a tower, at a different site and with different planners. It has kept the name. However, it no longer has anything to do with our museum concept from back then.

Timeline

  1. 2017

    Prof. Jürgen Graf proposes to the town of Heubach a timber observation tower around the radio relay tower on the Utzenberg. The building committee backs a student project on it.

    Source: Town of Heubach, building committee 26 Jul 2017 ↗

  2. 2019

    HfG Schwäbisch Gmünd develops a digital museum concept for the Albturm.

    Source: Town of Heubach, council meeting 29 Jan 2019 ↗

  3. 2020

    Prof. Graf and Prof. Dringenberg present the tower and the future forum to the town council (Gemeinderat). The council supports the bid in the state competition RegioWIN 2030; the costs are put at around €11.5 million. In December, the project joins the network of the IBA’27 (International Building Exhibition 2027).

    Source: Town of Heubach, council meeting 17 Nov 2020 ↗ · IBA’27 newsletter 06/2020 ↗

  4. 2021

    The “albturm mit Zukunftsforum” (Albturm with future forum) is named a RegioWIN lighthouse project. This allows the town to apply for funding from the EU and the state. In the autumn, Heubach’s mayor leaves to become Lord Mayor of Aalen.

    Source: Schwäbische Post, 14 Apr 2021 ↗ · Regierungspräsidium Stuttgart ↗

  5. 2022

    The Albturm moves into the town’s medium-term financial plan. In April, the funding application is submitted to the state.

    Source: Town of Heubach, council meeting 25 Jan 2022 ↗ · Ostalbkreis, annual report 2022 ↗

  6. 2023

    The administration puts the costs at €13 million, leaving the town with a funding gap of around €5.7 million. With two votes against, the council decides not to pursue the project any further and to withdraw the funding application.

    Source: Town of Heubach, council meeting 17 Oct 2023 ↗

  7. 2024

    Oberkochen sets aside around €7 million in its budget for a “Projekt Albturm”. A few weeks later, the council puts the plan on hold for the time being.

    Source: Town of Oberkochen, council meeting 29 Jan 2024 ↗ · Schwäbische Post, 22 Feb 2024 ↗

  8. 2025–26

    Instead, Oberkochen decides on a Zukunftsforum on Dreißentalstraße, without a tower and with new planners. In 2026, €7.5 million in funding from the EU and the state follow, along with the decision to build.

    Source: Town of Oberkochen, council meeting 31 Mar 2025 ↗ · Contract award 28 Jul 2025 ↗ · Schwäbische Post, 28 Jan 2026 ↗ · State ministry, 23 Jul 2026 ↗ · Decision to build 27 Jul 2026 ↗

I have since left the project and am not involved in its further development.

What remains

We never doubted the tower. It failed because of politics and money.

Our concept was meant to lead people from the view into the forum. In 2021, the mayor who had driven the project since 2017 moved to Aalen. After that, it moved into the medium-term financial plan, and in 2023 the council stopped the project, even though it had been named a RegioWIN lighthouse project and funding had been applied for. The concept remained a design, and I learned how much public projects depend on individual advocates.

Future museum concept: Prof. Ralf Dringenberg and Dominik Witzke. Tower design: Prof. Dr.-Ing. Jürgen Graf / graf ingenieure. Visitor forum: Prof. Stephan Birk / Birk Heilmeyer und Frenzel Architekten.

Next project

Beyond Chat

78 interactive prototypes for AI interfaces beyond the input field — and a framework that corrected itself while being built.

View project →